hello :
as you might have noticed in monitors now adays , a lot of BS Votes are sent in a purpose of advertising .

there for , and to Guarantee , the Acuricy and the Honesty in rating :
do you prefer monitor voting to be based on members only rating ?

what i want to do , is to build a membership based hyip monitor , and only members could vote by the rules .

let me hear your thaughts .

people are lazy.
the more they must do to to get till voting, the less people will vote.
from other side, fake voters doing it for money so complex procedure wouldnt stop them.

It's a good idea... but i ahve to agree with Sand that i doubt that that would stop them.

Procode

If this were a perfect world, I think it would work. I am sure it could be done to make sure that no fake votes were being done, but it would have to be pretty complex, and would have to be tested regularly.

Truly though, people are lazy, and they dont like to vote anyway. Even paying them, or offering to pay them does not seem to get people involved.

Voting is a good thing for any site, I like the idea that you have...just not sure how you would go about doing it.

Nice idea, however I dont think it will help decrease the paid voters much

i doubt... you can change your IP very simply with a proxy.

Procode

Very good idea, but it's easy to vote a lot of times

now after i heared from some of you , i could tell you my idea , and how it could be cheat proof .

voting will be based on membership .
only members can vote and send one vote per day .
members can't add vote until they are signed up as referrals from out=r referral link , and they have tested the program .
of course this needs some programming , and manual checks , but this is the only way to make the voting as reliable as we could .

and as you can see , if i did so , more trust will be put in monitors again .

it sounds like a crazy idea , but yes , it is for the best of the whole industry .

now please let me know what you think about it .

if only members who joined in your downline are allowed to vote, information presented in your site will be unreliable.

and how is that ?

for example,
1 - I know that program isnt paying, I cant vote to say that (oftentimes admin is paying to monitor and few members just to be listed as paid), so stats and votes are too positive, lure in new members which then loose.
2 - if you allow negative votes to prevent 1th scenario, competition make few negative votes, noone risk to invest and other investors cant vote positive.

Why don't you just manually validate each and every vote that comes through, meaning it has to go thru your confirmation before it is valid.

Yes it may take up more time and work but thats about the best way i can think of as member only voting would only mean less votes

manual validation is already happened as i check all the votes , and delete what is against the rules .
but i am looking for something new