My thought is this...

Lower the cap and see what happens. Those invested can wait it out. If it doesn't work add the subscription.

I've said this in my past post, but we could start subscriptions once your first positions expire. this way, monthly subscriptions would come in at different times causing influx of money all the time!

Yes, my suggestion about starting the cap first to try was because a lot of members may not want a subscription. This would also be a good alternative to add to it.

Excellent idea ! Simple and doable.

Maybe that is a little harsh - MMG is full of programs that "disappointed" past and present.Did Blondie promote all of them? No.Am I saying let Blondie lead you into anything without deciding for yourself the risk?No.I think Blondie might want to take a harder look before she promotes some things but I don't think it is her fault that they failed - most do sooner or later - no matter who promotes them.

That is a great idea but it won't have any effect on the program right now, it would take weeks for the effect to show, how hard is that to understand?
It won't have any effect because none of the positions have reached 200%.

Larry MAY consider an adjustment in his profits per share with the reduction of the CAP. Let's let him do his numbers. Yes, we are looking at a few weeks as it stands. I am here for the long haul.

All I know (and what many members who actually understand the trends) is that the changes need to be implemented ASAP! If Larry isn't open to the tons of suggestions by our more experiences marketers, than this is just another POS AD2M (for lack of better words).

Also, Like some of the members have said, if he has the time to update his FB group, then he has time to send out an email to our members. This lack of communication is reminiscent of TAB

Yes, it will take many weeks to see effects. I myself have no problem waiting. This is only fair to those who do not want a subscription implemented. I am seeking long term program.

PLEASE VOTE IN THE MEMBERS AREA

Whatever gets us bigger profits faster we need to go with that.

I've voted -

Voted

P

Well you know what i voted for

Thanks Larry!

Thanks for the opportunity to vote.
racer

i voted yes it will be sort of similar to the daily payer well there you get to keep 75% of the money and 25% goes back in the system. well i ask is this enough are awhile he is at it maybe change other few things . how does one pronounce lolalola dunno know how to pronounce ???

start it up no point in waiting for 7000 yes votes.

Well, Just voted for NO

I did too, but from the looks of things, lotta chicken little's voting up a storm.

i think it's pronounced lola lola. You know like pizza pizza!

So your just saying to everyone on this forum not join CWC with 1 position to test site all of you are killing this program no one will join after your done

I voted "Yes" and Larry it would be great for the program if you distribute $13.60 token price into position cycle rather than just mere $9...that would help to cycle 63 position instead of 45 position.

You can set Admin fees in cash out.

im the man @ I guess its "lola" ..lola+lola ...sound cute though

I voted YES to changing the 400% ROI to 200%.

what about lowering the ref commissions ?
They are high, many sites only offer 5% and some none at all ?

LOL!

The monthly subscription wasn't even taken into consideration in the voting.
Maybe put it there to see what CWC membership thinks is best... Maybe.

Yeah, couldn't help but notice that was conspicuously absent from everyone's suggestions.

Let's see...

I've done well in almost every program Blondie has recommended.

I made quite a bit in ad2million.

I'm nearly in profit and awaiting more funds from Mcf-ads.

And if this program can survive all the well-meaning advice from those that
earn most of their profits via ref coms & other assorted expert opinions, I'll
do okay here too.

Thanks, Blondie!

For the future, I'll be sure to check out the programs "adverted" by you.

@whwarner, If you see my referrals count you will realize that I've done a lot more than you to help the program.
Not only that but also share and help other set up their advertising campaigns at no cost to anyone and also try
and give some suggestion for the program to be improved, including lowering the CAP.

BTW, Voted Yes, lower the cap to 200% or as low as possible

Voted Yes for more stability

Now that everything is getting worked out everyone needs be more positive about CWC

Peace racer
I'm not the only 'promoter' here.
I don't even like being called that which if you knew me better, you would know.
But I think the promoters here DO deserve a big hand.
They've brought in a lot of members which gave us a great start and enabled a lot of cycling.

In any case, I voted YES as well.
I would rather see my own positions stop cycling sooner than later.
I think it'll help a lot in the near future and onward.

I will vote yes also and please get back me after you tell all them referrals about changes being made thanks

Hi strosdegoz, I have not forgotton about the subscription fee option.. just taking one step at a time right now. I have been looking over the stats posted eariler regarding this - we have a lot to consider here.

Although I have not read all the posts regarding CWC I am aware a storm of controversy has developed. Might I say, the CWC is working as it should and as advertised and stated. The only downside is the level of daily sales - this has dropped more than we would have liked - however, even if the sales stopped completely, this wouldn't mean the end of the circle, we would simply need to reinvigorate the sales system.

You would be amazed at the number of support tickets we get where members are complaining that their position has not cycled that day. How can we better advise prospective members how the program works. For me it seems clearly laid out in the sales pages and Terms - but maybe i'm missing something The last thing we want to do is mislead people.

As far as I'm concerned the program is based on a sound foundation and remains as positive as ever. We live and learn as we go, amending and improving where necessary.

i think admin should share max per position, i agree that suggestion to increase the share from $9 to as much as possible...

Thanks a lot for your reply,
I guess we should explain better the system to members before they join, this can reduce the workload on tickets.

I am glad that the fee is still being considered, even if its just for those in profit or when someone reaches a certain level, it is something really important in my opinion.

We know you are working hard and we appreciate that, keep up the good work.

I will keep on doing my part over here and bring as many members as I can and help others do the same.

Everything is looking a lot better already!

I just reinvested 1 token today and purchasing another 10 tomorrow

Change the position cap from 400% ($60) to 200% ($30)?

73% = YES | 27% = NO
(105 votes so far)

Just voted yes to save CWC

CWC still have the greatest membership ever, see how everyone is voting for stability instead of profit.

Keep it up everyone!!!!

hmmmm...but what about the 50% re-invest rule??? will it stay there even after lowering cap to 200%???

Yes it should, you earn on your re-purchase.

Coming together like this gives us all confidence!

@Kerosene, nice... im sure your purchase will speed up cycling tomorrow.....

guys....im confident that after implementing the changes... CWC is going to be right at the top..... its just because of the best ever active admin, LARRY!

Voted for the 200% Cap... that's a good move in my
opinion, expiring a lot of current Tokens soon,
encouraging more spending. Cycling is speeding
up as well.

No issues on my end and Larry is the man in charge
of the program, paying me on time, everytime since
I have made a cashout

I don't see how any Admin can entertain all these
suggestions and negativity anyway. Certainly...they don't.

Onwards and for people who have money in the program,
It's certainly in their best interest to support it as it
grows. I'm sure Larry will tweak the plan as needed in
the future if there is an issue.

Gord

I feel as confident as day one that this is going to be a huge program and I'm very impressed with the admins responses and ability to listen to members wants too. I'm also going to up the advertising tomorrow and see what I can do - I've never been one to advertise but have done a little for this site. I'm going to read some of Stroz's posts from earlier in the thread and take some advice / sites from there - I'll give it one hell of a go.

I think the ideas that people have been throwing together are great.

I'm confident, not complaining or moaning - I know my investments very safe in this site

Hey stros before you go patting yourself on the back realize that each link in a chain is just as important as the next.You have referred a bunch,helped others and made some good suggestions but everybody is important even somebody with 1 position and no refs.

to support the program, i think we should purchase more positions often... as new purchases are always better..!