Regarding LR and PM fees, am I true to say that LR has lower fees than PM?
I am comparing LR's receiving fee to PM's sending fee.
I mean, for amounts $600 and above.
For eg, for an amount of $650,
PM spending fee would be $3.25 ($650 x 0.5%).
Even though LR receiving fee is 1%, it is capped at max $2.99.
Which means for receiving $650, the fee is $2.99 (since $650 x 1% = $6.50 > $2.99 cap).
Are my calculations correct?
Full Version: Lr Vs Pm Fees
MoneyMakerGroup > Payment Processors & Currency Exchange > Payment Processors & E-Currencies > General Discussion
|
|
QUOTE (chaosgreen @ Jun 1 2009, 06:44 PM)  Regarding LR and PM fees, am I true to say that LR has lower fees than PM? I am comparing LR's receiving fee to PM's sending fee. I mean, for amounts $600 and above. For eg, for an amount of $650, PM spending fee would be $3.25 ($650 x 0.5%). Even though LR receiving fee is 1%, it is capped at max $2.99. Which means for receiving $650, the fee is $2.99 (since $650 x 1% = $6.50 > $2.99 cap). Are my calculations correct? you are right. When working with bigger sums of money, LR fees are more advantageous to the user QUOTE (syber90 @ Jun 2 2009, 11:06 PM) you are right. When working with bigger sums of money, LR fees are more advantageous to the user Thanks syber90 for taking the time to confirm with me!
Nice info, thanks!
So I'll take it that for transactions above around $625, Lr wins |
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.