MMG is very happy to announce that we are accepting E-Gold again! With Goldex's ability to out-exchange E-Gold, we are comfortable accepting E-Gold as payment, even with all the instability and chaos surrounding the currency. Please be aware that this may be short lived - we'll be keeping an eye on the news and if our ability to out-exchange E-Gold fails, then we will again be forced to remove E-Gold as an option.
QUOTE(Radmax @ May 23 2007, 01:17 AM) [snapback]4122715[/snapback]
MMG is very happy to announce that we are accepting E-Gold again! With Goldex's ability to out-exchange E-Gold, we are comfortable accepting E-Gold as payment, even with all the instability and chaos surrounding the currency. Please be aware that this may be short lived - we'll be keeping an eye on the news and if our ability to out-exchange E-Gold fails, then we will again be forced to remove E-Gold as an option.
For now, we're accepting it again - check out our revised advertising page: www.MoneyMakerGroup.com/Advertise
Good move Radmax, instead of panicking we should support e-gold... anyway also omnipay itselfe are OPEN for funding AND withdrawing, you just have to verify your address once and there you go
AtemlosX
nuk
May 22 2007, 06:29 PM
QUOTE(Radmax @ May 22 2007, 06:17 PM) [snapback]4122715[/snapback]
MMG is very happy to announce that we are accepting E-Gold again! With Goldex's ability to out-exchange E-Gold, we are comfortable accepting E-Gold as payment, even with all the instability and chaos surrounding the currency. Please be aware that this may be short lived - we'll be keeping an eye on the news and if our ability to out-exchange E-Gold fails, then we will again be forced to remove E-Gold as an option.
For now, we're accepting it again - check out our revised advertising page: www.MoneyMakerGroup.com/Advertise
What about V-Money?
NUK
DamianVincent
May 22 2007, 06:47 PM
QUOTE(Radmax @ May 22 2007, 02:17 PM) [snapback]4122715[/snapback]
MMG is very happy to announce that we are accepting E-Gold again! With Goldex's ability to out-exchange E-Gold, we are comfortable accepting E-Gold as payment, even with all the instability and chaos surrounding the currency. Please be aware that this may be short lived - we'll be keeping an eye on the news and if our ability to out-exchange E-Gold fails, then we will again be forced to remove E-Gold as an option.
For now, we're accepting it again - check out our revised advertising page: www.MoneyMakerGroup.com/Advertise
Is there more than one E Gold provider? I am asking because of a program I was considering joining in addition to the one I am currently in that requires an E-Bullion account. I am not familiar with it, nor have I opened the account yet. I'm kind of questioning why these methods are being used over checks or an easier method than the E-Bullion at least.
Thank you
Radmax
May 22 2007, 08:06 PM
QUOTE(nuk @ May 22 2007, 07:29 PM) [snapback]4123071[/snapback]
What about V-Money?
NUK
We still are doing some research on V-money, but it could be coming soon.
QUOTE(DamianVincent @ May 22 2007, 07:47 PM) [snapback]4123112[/snapback]
Is there more than one E Gold provider? I am asking because of a program I was considering joining in addition to the one I am currently in that requires an E-Bullion account. I am not familiar with it, nor have I opened the account yet. I'm kind of questioning why these methods are being used over checks or an easier method than the E-Bullion at least.
Thank you
There are several e-gold exchangers that will process in/out-exchanged. E-Gold and E-Bullion are two different ecurrencies, but we accept both as payment options. You can learn about some of the different currency options and exchangers in these forums: http://www.moneymakergroup.com/index.php?showforum=27
Michelle selen
May 22 2007, 09:16 PM
Thanks admin,glad to hear the news,and i believe we can make better in mmg! Best wishes to u!
spiderman4woman
May 23 2007, 01:08 AM
TQ. E-gold rocks!
WGAdmin
May 23 2007, 06:30 AM
Hello Radmax,I have bought sticky topic at HYIP section with e-gold. Check you PM box please.
Thanks
Radmax
May 23 2007, 06:45 AM
QUOTE(WGAdmin @ May 23 2007, 07:30 AM) [snapback]4125073[/snapback]
Hello Radmax,I have bought sticky topic at HYIP section with e-gold. Check you PM box please.
Thanks
I haven't received any PMs from you. Please submit a ticket with all the details through our advertising desk so we can get that up for you as soon as possible.
QUOTE(Radmax @ May 23 2007, 09:45 AM) [snapback]4125129[/snapback]
I haven't received any PMs from you. Please submit a ticket with all the details through our advertising desk so we can get that up for you as soon as possible.
According to their site Omnipay is the primary source for eGold exchange. I believe it's the eGold parent company or something like that.
gpmac12
Aug 2 2007, 08:50 AM
QUOTE(seedkaori @ Jun 2 2007, 07:17 AM) [snapback]4152819[/snapback]
hi there.. ^^ i'm newbie here.. is it true?? we can accept more gold from e-gold by posting in this forum??
What he is saying is that you can pay for things at the forum, by using -gold. They had stopped accepting it for a while.
olebup
Nov 1 2007, 08:03 AM
QUOTE(Radmax @ May 22 2007, 03:17 PM) [snapback]4122715[/snapback]
MMG is very happy to announce that we are accepting E-Gold again! With Goldex's ability to out-exchange E-Gold, we are comfortable accepting E-Gold as payment, even with all the instability and chaos surrounding the currency. Please be aware that this may be short lived - we'll be keeping an eye on the news and if our ability to out-exchange E-Gold fails, then we will again be forced to remove E-Gold as an option.
how could anybody with any business know-how or intelligence start using e-gold again. this group is under investigation by the federal gov't. i was doing business with another business and the feds placed a hold and took 2 million dollars. that company is now out of business leaving their customer base with huge losses. why would mmg be happy to make this announcement. can mmg gurantee the same situation won't happen again. i don't think so. golly bum ding dang dong. give us a break.
Radmax
Nov 1 2007, 12:58 PM
QUOTE(olebup @ Nov 1 2007, 09:03 AM) [snapback]4462622[/snapback]
how could anybody with any business know-how or intelligence start using e-gold again. this group is under investigation by the federal gov't. i was doing business with another business and the feds placed a hold and took 2 million dollars. that company is now out of business leaving their customer base with huge losses. why would mmg be happy to make this announcement. can mmg gurantee the same situation won't happen again. i don't think so. golly bum ding dang dong. give us a break.
You are replying to a post that is over 5 months old; a lot has developed in the courts since that time. Regardless, in that 5 months we have had a lot advertisers pay with e-gold and have had no problem out-exchanging it at face value. I think it could easily be argued that it was an "intelligent" business move to accept e-gold over those months instead of forgoing a large percentage of that revenue since many of our advertisers are not familiar with some of our other payment options.
Regardless, I think you are missing the intention behind the post. In early May we stopped accepting e-gold as a payment option for advertisements and upgrades due to some uncertainty in its liquidity. Many people wanted to see it return. I took note of this and worked out a deal with a reliable exchanger. In that post I never made any insinuation that e-gold should be trusted. I don't make guarantees for things I don't have direct control over. It was simply an announcement that we were accepting it as a payment option.
Jacob
olebup
Nov 1 2007, 02:46 PM
QUOTE(Radmax @ Nov 1 2007, 01:58 PM) [snapback]4463087[/snapback]
You are replying to a post that is over 5 months old; a lot has developed in the courts since that time. Regardless, in that 5 months we have had a lot advertisers pay with e-gold and have had no problem out-exchanging it at face value. I think it could easily be argued that it was an "intelligent" business move to accept e-gold over those months instead of forgoing a large percentage of that revenue since many of our advertisers are not familiar with some of our other payment options.
Regardless, I think you are missing the intention behind the post. In early May we stopped accepting e-gold as a payment option for advertisements and upgrades due to some uncertainty in its liquidity. Many people wanted to see it return. I took note of this and worked out a deal with a reliable exchanger. In that post I never made any insinuation that e-gold should be trusted. I don't make guarantees for things I don't have direct control over. It was simply an announcement that we were accepting it as a payment option.
Jacob
thank you for your explanation of why you guys are using e-gold again. the simple fact e-gold was under investigation by the fed and was in litagation, is enough by its self not to use these people. the fact that one companie's money of 2 million dollars was seized by the fed, from e-gold and never returned or repaid is even worse. and it doesn't matter if i was replying to a post 5 months old or 5 years old.
now, i can understand the position mmg was in concerning revenue and their advertising base. however, i would think that mmg would have been more responsible by informing all parties of the risk involved with using e-gold. i think in this case, it appears the revenue and risk factors were given more credibility than informing all parties of e-gold's problems.
i think you made my point, by stating you could offer no gurantees over something you did not have direct control over. as indicated by e-golds past performance, there's no way anyone would gurantee their liquidity.
i guess the bottom line is i just expected more professonlism from mmg in this situation. and of course this is just my opinon. we all have a hard time in our industry with the honesty and credibility factors. i don't think for a minute mmg was trying to be dishonest. i just don't think mmg actions were well thought out.
Radmax
Nov 1 2007, 06:20 PM
QUOTE(olebup @ Nov 1 2007, 03:46 PM) [snapback]4463202[/snapback]
thank you for your explanation of why you guys are using e-gold again. the simple fact e-gold was under investigation by the fed and was in litagation, is enough by its self not to use these people. the fact that one companie's money of 2 million dollars was seized by the fed, from e-gold and never returned or repaid is even worse. and it doesn't matter if i was replying to a post 5 months old or 5 years old.
now, i can understand the position mmg was in concerning revenue and their advertising base. however, i would think that mmg would have been more responsible by informing all parties of the risk involved with using e-gold. i think in this case, it appears the revenue and risk factors were given more credibility than informing all parties of e-gold's problems.
i think you made my point, by stating you could offer no gurantees over something you did not have direct control over. as indicated by e-golds past performance, there's no way anyone would gurantee their liquidity.
i guess the bottom line is i just expected more professonlism from mmg in this situation. and of course this is just my opinon. we all have a hard time in our industry with the honesty and credibility factors. i don't think for a minute mmg was trying to be dishonest. i just don't think mmg actions were well thought out.
Again, I made no recommendation to use e-gold. In fact, if you read some of my other post history you will see I have advocated moving away from it for several months. I saw no reason to detail the potential risks of e-gold since the risk of accepting e-gold spends lies squarely on MMG's shoulders and the vast majority of our advertisers were very aware at that time of the e-gold situation. If e-gold died the very next day MMG would be the ones eating the loss, advertisers would still see their orders fully processed. I suppose there is a very small risk that potential advertisers would try to obtain some e-gold and by the time they are ready to advertise we not accept it anymore, but I think you could reasonably deduce that risk from this statement in the original post:
QUOTE
Please be aware that this may be short lived - we'll be keeping an eye on the news and if our ability to out-exchange E-Gold fails, then we will again be forced to remove E-Gold as an option.
Taken out of context, you could spin this decision all kinds of ways if you want to. Who are you to say we weren't offering a valuable service to the community by giving people a place to quickly offload some of their e-gold reserves in a time where e-gold had some liquidity problems? That is just as plausible of a reasoning as anything else you or I have said. It's not true since that was not my intent, but neither was it my intent to passively recommend e-gold.
Anyways, at this point I'll just agree to disagree. The post was never intended to be a recommendation of e-gold and it doesn't appear many people had any problems with it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.