Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> What is this section?


This section houses closed, inactive, and offline programs.

Closed programs are programs whose administrators have officially announced the end to their programs.

Inactive programs are programs whose thread on MMG has not had a single post for a period of 4+ weeks.

Offline programs are programs whose websites have been down for a minimum of 7 days.

694 Pages V  « < 692 693 694  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Zeekrewards - Zeekrewards.com
CharityMan
post Jan 14 2015, 01:18 AM
Post #10396


New MoneyMaker
*

Group: Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 18-August 14
Member No.: 555,661



A few excerpts from Gary;

1st one from http://patrickpretty.com/2013/12/12/urgent...#comment-72615:
"I just found the receiver’s motion and am surprised that ALL the defendants (both insiders & net winners) are basically individuals (& their small entities). I was curious as to inclusion of overseas individual because according to your article each of them got around 1 million dollar over which might satisfy minimum amount to pursue but I originally thought the receiver already included big institutions such as global banks or brokers claiming tens of million dollars return each in the motion.
The industry specialist describes clawback as “While the courts go through the tedious process of determining who owns what and how they got it, trustees typically “grab the low-hanging fruit first,” Henning added — “the Lamborghinis and the yachts. “All of which raises the question: How much of what gets clawed back will ultimately be left to distribute to victims? Sometimes pennies on the dollar, if that. “Unfortunately, a lot of these bankrupt estates can eat up an awful lot of resources,” said Painter. “. Well, the Zeek receiver stressed a lot about its efficient litigation consolidating numerous small cases in class action that can only be done in this $600 million size with huge number of net winners, relatively big for Ponzi and pyramid scheme.
However, read this http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/10/10/...-spent-receiver , even $7.2 billion case doesn’t look encouraging progress."
- Isn't Stanford receiver not a court appointed receiver?

2nd one (actually Gary quoted this from another person's post) from http://patrickpretty.com/2014/05/08/zeek-r...#comment-89934:
"Bear it in mind that there has been so many evidences that Ponzi receivers eat up the assets that could have returned to victims if they hadn’t done costly & lengthy clawback, such as Stanford case (Ralph Janvey), Legisi case (Robert D. Gordon), J.V. Huffman case (William Walt Pettit) and more & more. "
- aren't these receivers not appointed by the courts?

Unfortunately, the apple & orange comparison doesn't seem to apply generally.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paid Advertisement
 
Go to the top of the page
 
Lynndel
post Jan 14 2015, 07:52 PM
Post #10397


MMG Member
**********

Group: Member
Posts: 3,082
Joined: 28-July 08
From: United States
Member No.: 146,876



If Gary is to upset or whatever it is he feels, have him come and here and let him and I have a discussion. Not going to deal with an intermediary any longer including Charlie.


--------------------
President/Founder Eagle Research Associates; www.eagleresearchassociates.org, www.Swindles.org; Author: Robbing You With A Keyboard Instead Of A Gun - Cyber Crime How They Do It (available in soft cover and eBook at Amazon.com)
Lifetime Member of the National Association of Distinguished Professionals
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CharityMan
post Jan 14 2015, 11:30 PM
Post #10398


New MoneyMaker
*

Group: Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 18-August 14
Member No.: 555,661




"Sad to see the thread becoming meaningless discussion.", you still don't get it, do you?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lynndel
post Jan 18 2015, 02:19 AM
Post #10399


MMG Member
**********

Group: Member
Posts: 3,082
Joined: 28-July 08
From: United States
Member No.: 146,876



Todd Disner lost his appeal trying to keep his ill-gotten gains from Zeek. The court entered a default judgment against him. Todd didn't like that decision, so he filed a pro se appeal with his usual nonsensical arguments that he should be able to keep his ill-gotten gains. I hope the judge tosses his appeal immediately as frivolous and wasting the courts time.


--------------------
President/Founder Eagle Research Associates; www.eagleresearchassociates.org, www.Swindles.org; Author: Robbing You With A Keyboard Instead Of A Gun - Cyber Crime How They Do It (available in soft cover and eBook at Amazon.com)
Lifetime Member of the National Association of Distinguished Professionals
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lynndel
post Jan 21 2015, 04:40 PM
Post #10400


MMG Member
**********

Group: Member
Posts: 3,082
Joined: 28-July 08
From: United States
Member No.: 146,876



Kenneth Bell replied to Todd Disner's appeal of the default judgment to the court and said this:

Mr. Disner has failed to meet the threshold showing necessary to succeed on a Rule 60(b) motion, as this Court previously ruled when deciding Mr. Disner’s motion to set aside the entry of default. Furthermore, he has failed to clearly establish any of the grounds necessary to allow the default judgment against him to be vacated. The Receiver does not believe the motion warrants further substantive argument, however, if the Court desires a supplemental analysis or explanation why the motion should be denied, the Receiver respectfully requests the opportunity to supplement this memorandum before the Court renders a decision.


--------------------
President/Founder Eagle Research Associates; www.eagleresearchassociates.org, www.Swindles.org; Author: Robbing You With A Keyboard Instead Of A Gun - Cyber Crime How They Do It (available in soft cover and eBook at Amazon.com)
Lifetime Member of the National Association of Distinguished Professionals
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paid Advertisement
 
Go to the top of the page
 

694 Pages V  « < 692 693 694
Reply to this topicStart new topic
19 User(s) are reading this topic (19 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Skin designed by IPB Forum Skins

FEATURED AD - NEW STATIC AD



Advertise on MMG Today!


Advertisement